The last few blog posts have been about growth and to make changes in a company needs senior management approval. It makes life much easier if senior management actually wishes to make changes. If they do not, you will have to learn how to pick your spots while you either move up or wait for the management to change. If you decide to pick your spots, Rocking the Boat by Debra Meyerson, Havard Business Press, Boston, 2008 is a good book to read as the subtitle is How to Effect Change Without Making Trouble. The idea is you enjoy what you do and want to keep your job but move the organization to something better than it is.
The steps are essentially how to negotiate whatever you want, except in a medium size or large business, processes often move at their pace. Which means having an ear to the environment of the organization. It also means figuring out how to remain true to yourself; how to turn personal threats into opportunities; how to broaden the impact and leveraging small wins into bigger results. Organizations all evolve through many different decisions, some people are better managers, some are bad managers but they were promoted and if you work for them, you likely still want to work for the company and the first method to rock the boat is stay employed. The second method is to get promoted and be a good manager of people. Often times middle management can have the greatest effect because they manage people well and by managing them well can adapt some corporate rules to fit into people’s lives. The adaption will then be noticed by others and soon it will be the new normal, but it starts will people being true to how they are. We are all individuals, but come to work for an organization, some of that individual we leave at home, some of it we bring to the organization.
In many instances the answers which are never black or white, come to how hard should your push? The factors are:
1. Timing – is it a good time to take a risk and pose a challenge?
2. Stakes – is this a fight worth fighting for? how high are the stakes?
3. Likelihood of Success – how promising are the hoped-for results? will people learn?
4. Options – are there better alternative responses to those that oppose a risk to you? are there better ways which you have not explored – committees?
5. Consequences of failure – what are the worst outcomes? do you expect to be promoted? will it happen after the push back?
6. Personal association – why this issue? can you find a third party to help?
7. Doability – does a response feel doable? what outcome do you want?
The above are generic to typical negotiations, the key is to have actually thought about the results and consequences before hand. Many people tend to try to rock the boat, but they have not thought of the consequences and end up marginalized. If you are going to change something or work on something being changed, what outcome you have in mind is a very good first consideration and the outcome has to be in the language or those who you wish to change. An example is you might think of personal reason, the other person thinks does it cost the company money or bring in more profits if you change something? The other person also thinks that going through the ranks to where they are, life had many sacrifices which you do not know about.
Linking to dividend paying stocks, similar to things in life, when you buy company shares at some point time you may run into someone who works at the company. Sometimes it is one of the reason you bought the stock. You have an opportunity to ask on a more regular basis about the person’s work and actively listen. One of the many things is asking about how change works in the organization.
There are more questions than answers, till the next time – to raising questions