Last year, President Trump announced a change in the supply system by imposing tariffs and then announced his desire to 90 deals in 90 days. In the past trade deals tended to take years because they are complicated, but the President wanted deals.
The first deal was with UK and it was agreed in May and signed on September 18, 2025.
In an article by Eshe Nelson and Ana Swanson of the New York Times News Service, the critics warned the terms were loose and the commitments vague. Now the risks of that ambiguity are becoming apparent.
The US informed the British government that it would pause fulfilling a technology-related agreement between the 2 countries, which included more collaboration on artificial intelligence (AI) and nuclear energy. The move came because American officials felt that the UK was not making sufficient progress in lowering trade barriers as promised in the May agreement.
Part of the agreement was the Tech Prosperity Deal, which extended research collaborations and encouraged deeper commercial partnerships. America’s big tech companies announced more than $40 billion in investments in Britain for AI data centers and other technologies.
But the language of the agreement said it only becomes operative alongside substantive progress being made to formalize and implement the May trade agreement.
The Trump administration says the UK has made insufficient efforts. The White House announced the agreement, but has kept negotiations with countries open for months after the President has said they were done.
The 90 deals in 90 days has amounted to 15 deals which are not yet completed. There is an Supreme Court challenge coming up in January which could invalidate many of the President’s tariffs because of how they implemented (by emergency power signed by the President) rather than agreement by the House and Senate. In addition, President Trump has granted exemptions on some goods.
Linking to dividend paying companies, the companies tend to thrive in strong stable governments where the rules and regulations change slowly, but they can adapt if needed. For the tariff policy, many have adapted by controlling costs including hiring less people and raising prices. At some point there is a limit of how much costs can be cut, making greater margins is the key to success. Everyone will be watching the Supreme Court’s questions and answers as well as the rational of what the government lawyers say. Stability is good for business.
There are more questions than answers, till the next time – to raising questions.